The Facts And Fiction In The Mcdonalds Coffee Lawsuit
The judicial process is always fair and that is why it has been strengthened overtime. People bring the court cases to get a good verdict from the courts and they tend to handle all the types of cases that there are. One case type that is really delicate is the personal injury ones and that is because they involve the personal injury. There are really no fixed penalties and most of the people tend to feel if they lose the case that the verdict was unfair. One such case that the people have been talking about for so long is one that involved a leading coffee company. A lady that was made rich through compensation in a coffee lawsuit is what people have been hearing in the news or reading.
The lady who got compensated was burnt by the coffee when the coffee spilt on her lap and she filed a court case. Sources tell that she was holding the coffee with her laps while she drove and that compensation was unfair. However, before judging, we should be able to get the facts of the whole case right and why the company chose to pay.
First of all, the company had a lot of complaints from the other clients who suffered from burns from their coffee. With all of these personal injury claims against them, the chances of the company to get a win were slim because it is not just about the clients negligence but also the problem was with their coffee.
The coffee that the company made was too hot and they admitted to that. The coffee that they served was at 180 degrees and the standard in the market was 135 degrees and that meant that it was too hot. Such heat is able to cause second degree burns that the client was able to suffer and the fact that they admitted to knowing made it even worse for them.
The lady was able to get some serious burns and that is another fact. The lady was hurt enough and the evidence is because there are medical records that show she was admitted and received medication for some time.
The lady was old and in the company of her grandson is another dimension that the case was looked into. In contrast to what many were led to believe, the lady was old and not in her middle ages. The lady sat in the passenger seat as the grandson drove and that is another fact. The winning of the case came because the personal injury lawyer was competent enough and argued with the facts.